Characteristics
Domains assessed:
Application/function
Specific context:
Health Promotion
Validation sample population age:
Adults: 18 to 64 years, Older Adults: 65+ years
Modes of administration in validation study
:
Face-to-face
Time Cut-off:
0 minutes
Assessment:
Self-reported
Psychometrics
Number of items:
1
Sample size in validation study:
174
Administration Time (minutes):
1 minutes
Language of validated version:
Italian
Main article reference
Bonaccorsi, G., Grazzini, M., Pieri, L., Santomauro, F., Ciancio, M., & Lorini, C. (2017). Assessment of Health Literacy and validation of single-item literacy screener (SILS) in a sample of Italian people. Ann Ist Super Sanita. 53(3):205-212. doi: 10.4415/ANN_17_03_05
Link to articleDescription
A single-item test to identify inadequate health literacy, in Italian language
Year Measure first Published: 2006
About This Measure
Scoring categories:
Response recorded on a 5-point Likert-type scale and categorized as inadequate or adequate (score>=2 for inadequate HL).
Modern Approach for Tool Development:
No
About the Validation of this Measure
Country where validated:
Italy
Criterion validity:
As respect NVS: - Spearman’s rho= -0.679 (p<0.001). - Area Under ROC Curve: 0.847 considering “adequate HL” at the NVS vs “high likelihood of limited HL” + “possibility of limited HL” at NVS; 0.875 considering “adequate HL” +“possibility of limited HL” at the NVS vs “high likelihood of limited HL” at the NVS. - with a cut-off value of 2, considering “adequate HL” at the NVS vs “high likelihood of limited HL” + “possibility of limited HL” at NVS: 70.8% Sensitivity, 89.0% Specificity; 82.2% total accuracy; 79.3% Positive Predicted Value; 83.6% Negative Predicted Value, 0.6 Cohen's kappa value - with a cut-off value of 2, considering “adequate HL” + “high likelihood of limited HL” at the NVS vs “possibility of limited HL” at NVS: 83.3 Sensitivity, 82.6 Specificity, 82.8 total accuracy, 60.3 Positive Predicted Value, 94.0 Negative Predicted Value, 0.6 Cohen's kappa value