Skip to main content

italian version of the single-item literacy screener

Characteristics

Domains assessed: Application/function
Specific context: Health Promotion
Validation sample population age: Adults: 18 to 64 years, Older Adults: 65+ years
Modes of administration in validation study : Face-to-face
Time Cut-off: 0 minutes
Assessment: Self-reported

Psychometrics

Number of items: 1
Sample size in validation study: 174
Administration Time (minutes): 1 minutes
Language of validated version: Italian

Main article reference

Bonaccorsi, G., Grazzini, M., Pieri, L., Santomauro, F., Ciancio, M., & Lorini, C. (2017). Assessment of Health Literacy and validation of single-item literacy screener (SILS) in a sample of Italian people. Ann Ist Super Sanita. 53(3):205-212. doi: 10.4415/ANN_17_03_05

Link to article

Corresponding author

user
Guglielmo Bonaccorsi
map-pin
viale GB Morgagni 48, Firenze, FI, Italy
Contact the corresponding author for this tool

Description

A single-item test to identify inadequate health literacy, in Italian language

Year Measure first Published: 2006

About This Measure

Scoring categories: Response recorded on a 5-point Likert-type scale and categorized as inadequate or adequate (score>=2 for inadequate HL).
Modern Approach for Tool Development: No

About the Validation of this Measure

Country where validated: Italy
Criterion validity: As respect NVS: - Spearman’s rho= -0.679 (p<0.001). - Area Under ROC Curve: 0.847 considering “adequate HL” at the NVS vs “high likelihood of limited HL” + “possibility of limited HL” at NVS; 0.875 considering “adequate HL” +“possibility of limited HL” at the NVS vs “high likelihood of limited HL” at the NVS. - with a cut-off value of 2, considering “adequate HL” at the NVS vs “high likelihood of limited HL” + “possibility of limited HL” at NVS: 70.8% Sensitivity, 89.0% Specificity; 82.2% total accuracy; 79.3% Positive Predicted Value; 83.6% Negative Predicted Value, 0.6 Cohen's kappa value - with a cut-off value of 2, considering “adequate HL” + “high likelihood of limited HL” at the NVS vs “possibility of limited HL” at NVS: 83.3 Sensitivity, 82.6 Specificity, 82.8 total accuracy, 60.3 Positive Predicted Value, 94.0 Negative Predicted Value, 0.6 Cohen's kappa value
lightbulb

We would love your feedback on this measure. Please send your comments or questions to the Tool Shed.

Send Feedback
Jump back to top