International Self-Assessment Tool for Organizational Health Literacy (Responsiveness) of Hospitals
Characteristics
Domains assessed:
Organizational Health Literacy
Specific context:
Organizational Health Literacy
Modes of administration in validation study
:
Computer-based, Paper and pencil
Assessment:
Self-reported
Cost:
Free
Psychometrics
Number of items:
155
Sample size in validation study:
0
Administration Time (minutes):
190 minutes
Language of validated version:
German
Main article reference
International Working Group Health Promoting Hospitals and Health Literate Healthcare Organizations (Working Group HPH & HLO) (2019): International Self-Assessment Tool Organizational Health Literacy (Responsiveness) for Hospitals - SAT-OHL-Hos-v1.3-ENinternational (updated 2023). Vienna: WHO Collaborating Centre for Health Promotion in Hospitals and Healthcare (CC-HPH).
Link to articleDescription
Self-assessment tool to identify the status of a healthcare organization's health literacy and pinpoint areas for improvement
Year Measure first Published: 2019
About This Measure
Categorical scoring:
Yes
Scoring categories:
Each indicator rated by degree of fulfillment: Fulfilled completely (76-100%) Fulfilled to a large extent (51-75%) Fulfilled to a lesser extent (26-50%) Not fulfilled (0-25%) N/A
About the Validation of this Measure
Country where validated:
Austria, Germany, Italy, Norway, Serbia
Content validity:
The OHL-Hos is grounded in a comprehensive, theory‑based framework. The tool is built upon the Vienna Concept of a Health Literate Health Care Organization and the definition by Pelikan & Dietscher, both internationally recognized conceptualizations of organizational health literacy.Indicators reflect recognized international quality standards: The operationalization of standards and indicators is explicitly aligned with: International Society for Quality in Health Care (ISQua) principles for healthcare standards. WHO standards for health promotion in hospitals.The tool was refined through international expert input and cross-national adaptation.The indicators comprehensively reflect all relevant domains of OHLUsers across multiple countries confirm that it captures relevant OHL practices. Interdisciplinary teams can interpret and use the content meaningfully.
Additional Notes:
Divided into 8 standards, 21 sub-standards and 155 indicators (including sub-indicators): Standard 1: Implement organizational health literacy best-practices across all structures and processes of the organization, Standard 2: Develop documents, materials and services with stakeholders in a participatory manner, Standard 3: Enable and train staff for personal and organizational health literacy, Standard 4: Provide and support easy navigation and access to documents, materials and services, Standard 5: Apply health literacy best-practices in all forms of communication with patients, Standard 6: Promote personal health literacy of patients and relatives after discharge, Standard 7: Promote personal health literacy of staff with regard to occupational risks and personal lifestyles, Standard 8: Contribute to promoting personal and organizational health literacy in the region Derived from the Vienna Health Literate Organization (HLO)-model/self-assessment tool For evaluation, there is an Excel tool available for entering results, provided by authors upon request Also provide a template for action plans/brainstorming improvement measures, and steps to follow for the self-assessment procedure