Skip to main content

Health Literacy Scale in Korean

Characteristics

Domains assessed: Information seeking: Document, Comprehension, Communication: Speaker, Communication: Listener, Appraisal, Application/function
Specific context: Diabetes
Validation sample population age: Adults: 18 to 64 years
Modes of administration in validation study: Paper and pencil

Psychometrics

Number of items: 14
Sample size in validation study: 459
Language of validated version: Korean

Main article reference

Lee, E., & Lee, Y. W. (2017). First order vs. second-order structural validity of the Health Literacy Scle in patients with daibetes. Scandanavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 32(1), 441-447. doi:10.1111/scs,12460

Link to article

Corresponding author

user
Eun-Hyun Lee
map-pin
Eun‐Hyun Lee, Graduate School of Public Health, Ajou University, 164 Worldcup‐ro,, Yeongtong‐gu, Suwon‐si, Gyeonggi‐do, South Korea
Contact the corresponding author for this tool

Description

Tool to Measure Health Literacy Scale (HLS) in Korean patients with diabetes.

Year Measure first Published: 2017

About This Measure

About the Validation of this Measure

Country where validated: South Korea
Content validity: The development of the tool included rigorous translation and back‐translation technique from the original Japanese version of the HLS. Two bilingual laypersons were independently involved in each translation, and there was an expert panel that discussed any discrepancies between the versions
Reliability (Cronbach Alpha): 0.9
Reliability notes: Functional = 0.92, communicative = 0.86, critical = 0.90 . Cronbach's alpha for the internal consistency reliability of the HLS‐K in the present study was 0.90, which is higher than the values of 0.78 and 0.81 found for the Japanese version 5, 8, and of 0.77 for the German version 10. However, the Cronbach's alpha values for all languages versions satisfied the normal criterion of 0.70, which suggests that the HLS exhibits internal consistency reliability across languages.
lightbulb

We would love your feedback on this measure. Please send your comments or questions to the Tool Shed.

Send Feedback
Jump back to top