Skip to main content

Chinese version of short-form Test of Functional Health Literacy in Adolescents

Characteristics

Domains assessed: Numeracy, Prose: Comprehension
Specific context: General
Validation sample population age: Adolescents: 10 to 17 years
Modes of administration in validation study : Face-to-face, Paper and pencil
Assessment: Objective

Psychometrics

Number of items: 36
Sample size in validation study: 300
Administration Time (minutes): 11 minutes
Language of validated version: Taiwanese

Main article reference

Chang, L.C., Hsieh, P.L., & Liu, C.H. (2012). Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of short-form Test of Functional Health Literacy in Adolescents. J Clin Nurs, 21:2429-2437.

Link to article

Corresponding author

user
Li-Chun Chang
map-pin
Department of Nursing, Chang-Gung University of Science and Technology, No. 261, Wen-Hua 1st Rd., Kwei-Shan, Tao-Yuan, Taiwan
Contact the corresponding author for this tool

Description

To measure functional health literacy in Chinese adolescents

Year Measure first Published: 2012

About This Measure

Measure style: TOFHLA Family
Categorical scoring: No
Scoring categories: Correct responses scored 1; incorrect responses scored 0.
Reliability: Test-retest correlation: 0.95

About the Validation of this Measure

Country where validated: Taiwan
Content validity: Translated the English version of the s-TOFHLA into Chinese and then back into English per the Brislin (1970) method. Equivalance of meaning between versions was determined and rated by experts. Experts were asked to rate the relevance of the contents independently by using the content validity index (CVI) and rate each sentece on the c-sTOFHLAd based on relevance and semantic equivalence.
Criterion validity: Significant correlation with the REALM
Reliability (Cronbach Alpha): 0.85
lightbulb

We would love your feedback on this measure. Please send your comments or questions to the Tool Shed.

Send Feedback
Jump back to top