Skip to main content

Measurement of Health Literacy Among Adolescents Questionnaire

Characteristics

Domains assessed: Comprehension
Validation sample population age: Adolescents: 10 to 17 years
Modes of administration in validation study: Paper and pencil, Computer-based

Psychometrics

Number of items: 29
Sample size in validation study: 625
Language of validated version: German

Main article reference

Domanska, O. M., Bollweg, T. M., Loer, A.-K., Holmberg, C., Schenk, L., & Jordan, S. (2020). Development and Psychometric Properties of a Questionnaire Assessing Self-Reported Generic Health Literacy in Adolescence. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(8), 2860. doi:10.3390/ijerph17082860

Link to article

Corresponding author

user
Olga Maria Domanska
map-pin
Robert Koch Institute, General Pape-Straße 62-66, Berlin, Germany
Contact the corresponding author for this tool

Description

MOHLAA-Q is developed to assess self-reported general health literacy among adolescents (age 14 to 17). The questionnaire operationalizes generic health literacy as a multidimensional construct. It reflects core dimensions of generic health literacy by assessing cognitive, behavioral, behavioral-communicative, affective and conative components. Those dimensions are captured in four (A-D) scales consisting of 29 items in total: Scale A is an age-adapted version of the European Health Literacy Survey Questionnaire for adolescents aged 14–17 years (short name: HLS-EU-Q12-Adolescents-DE). It measures how easy or difficult adolescents perceive finding, understanding, appraising, and applying of health-related information in the domains of healthcare, disease prevention and health promotion. Scale B captures communication and interaction skills about health-related topics. Scale C focuses on health-related self-awareness, self-control, self-efficacy, motivation and interest in health-related topics. Scale D measures health-related knowledge, e.g., health risks due to alcohol consumption or patient rights. The questionnaire is validated for German-speaking adolescents.

Year Measure first Published: 2020

About This Measure

Categorical scoring: Yes
Scoring categories: Mean scores are calculated for scale A, B and C, and a sum score for scale D. For scale A, one missing value within twelve items is allowed, whereas in scale B and C each item should be responded. In scale D, missing answers are equated with the answer option “Do not know” and coded as “not right”. More information about scoring categories can be found also in: Loer, A. M., Domanska, O. M., Stock, C., & Jordan, S. (2020). Subjective Generic Health Literacy and Its Associated Factors among Adolescents: Results of a Population-Based Online Survey in Germany. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 17(22), 8682. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17228682 Mean score of scale A ranges from 1 to 4 and should be categorized as follows: ≥1 & ≤ 2.5 = “many difficulties in dealing with health-related information” > 2.5 & ≤3 = “some difficulties in dealing with health-related information” > 3 & ≤ 3.5 = “few difficulties in dealing with health-related information” > 3.5 & ≤ 4 = “barely/no difficulties in dealing with health-related information” Mean score of scale B ranges from 1 to 4 and is categorized as follows: ≥1 & ≤ 2,5 = ”low communication/-interaction skills” > 2.5 & ≤ 3 = “moderate communication/-interaction skills” >3 & ≤ 3.5 = “rather high communication/-interaction skills” > 3.5 & ≤ 4 = “high communication/-interaction skills” Mean score of scale C ranges from 1 to 5 and can be categorized as follows: ≥1 and ≤3 = “passive attitudes towards one´s own health and health information” >3 and ≤4 = “partly passive-partly active attitudes towards one´s own health and health information” >4 and ≤5 = “active regarding attitudes towards one´s own health and health information” Sum score of scale D ranges from 0 to 8 and can be categorized as follows: 0 & ≤ 3 = “low health-related knowledge” 4 & ≤ 5 = “moderate health-related knowledge” 6 & ≤ 8 = “high health-related knowledge

About the Validation of this Measure

Country where validated: Germany
Content validity: Created through a two-stage process: Stage 1 comprised the development and validation of the questionnaire using a literature review, two rounds of cognitive interviews, two focus groups and two rounds of expert assessments by health literacy experts. Stage 2 included a standard pretest (n = 625) of the questionnaire draft to examine the psychometric properties, reliability and different validity aspects.
Reliability notes: The internal consistency coefficients (Cronbach’s ) of the scales A-C varied from 0.54 to 0.77.
lightbulb

We would love your feedback on this measure. Please send your comments or questions to the Tool Shed.

Send Feedback
Jump back to top