Skip to main content

Evaluation Tool Development for Food Literacy Programs

Characteristics

Domains assessed: Application/function
Specific context: Nutrition
Validation sample population age: Older Adults: 65+ years, Adults: 18 to 64 years
Modes of administration in validation study: Paper and pencil

Psychometrics

Number of items: 14
Sample size in validation study: 882
Administration Time (minutes): 10 minutes
Language of validated version: English

Main article reference

Begley, A., Paynter, E., Dhaliwal, S.S. (2018). Evaluation Tool Development for Food Literacy Programs, Nutrients, 10(11): pii: E1617

Version 2 of the FLBC tool published (2021)
Paynter, E.; Begley, A.; Butcher, L.M.; Dhaliwal, S.S. The Validation and Improvement of a Food Literacy Behavior Checklist for Food Literacy Programs. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 13282. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182413282

Link to article

Corresponding author

user
Andrea Begley
map-pin
School of Population Health, Curtin University, Perth 6152, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
Contact the corresponding author for this tool

Description

The aim of this paper is to describe the development and validation of a self-administered questionnaire to measure food literacy behaviour for the Food Sensations for Adults program delivery in Western Australia.
A 14 item measure was developed based on similar questions used in previous research and questions developed to meet the program objectives.

Year Measure first Published: 2018

About This Measure

Categorical scoring: Yes
Scoring categories: Never (1) Sometimes (2) Most of the time (3) Always (4)

About the Validation of this Measure

Country where validated: Australia
Content validity: An original list of previously used 27 behavior questions drawn from EFNEP along with other research was used as the starting point and narrowed down to 18 behavior items for the pilot testing for face validity. Consideration was given to colloquial terms, and these were changed as necessary such as 'grocery' used in the US to 'shopping' in Australia. Items selected were to be consistently answered on the same Likert scale of frequency from 'never'(1) to 'always'(5).
Reliability notes: Cronbach's alpha was used to explore internal consistency of each of the defined food literacy behavior factors, calculated to be 0.79, 0.76, and 0.81 for Plan & Manage, Selection, and Preparation.
lightbulb

We would love your feedback on this measure. Please send your comments or questions to the Tool Shed.

Send Feedback
Jump back to top