Skip to main content

Functional Health Literacy Test

Characteristics

Domains assessed: Information seeking: Document
Specific context: General
Validation sample population age: Adults: 18 to 64 years
Modes of administration in validation study : Paper and pencil
Assessment: Objective

Psychometrics

Number of items: 21
Sample size in validation study: 223
Language of validated version: English

Main article reference

Zhang, X.H., Thumboo, J., Fong, K.Y., & Li, S.C. (2009). Development and validation of a functional health literacy test. Patient, 2(3):169-78.

Link to article

Corresponding author

user
Xu-Hao Zhang
map-pin
Department of Pharmacy, National University of Singapore, Singapore
Contact the corresponding author for this tool

Description

Cloze-style reading comprehension of health related content

Year Measure first Published: 2009

About This Measure

Measure style: TOFHLA Family
Categorical scoring: Yes
Scoring categories: Sum score categorized as proficient literacy (score >82), basic literacy (70–81), and below basic literacy (score <70)
Reliability: Test-retest correlation: Test-retest reliability of the Functional Health Literacy Test among rheumatic patients was shown to be high (ICC = 0.95).

About the Validation of this Measure

Country where validated: Malaysia
Content validity: Maze procedure, expert judgment, and interviews with 55 respondents were used to develop the 21-item FHLT, which was modified from public health education material entitled Guidelines on Taking Medicines, published by the Singapore Health Promotion Board.
Criterion validity: Convergent: REALM r=0.65 public and REALM r=0.68 rheumatic; Divergent: Edu r=0.33 public and Edu r=0.28 rheumatic
lightbulb

We would love your feedback on this measure. Please send your comments or questions to the Tool Shed.

Send Feedback
Jump back to top