Skip to main content

Calgary Charter on Health Literacy - Spanish

Characteristics

Domains assessed: Prose: Comprehension, Information seeking: Interactive media navigation, Information seeking: Document, Conceptual Knowledge, Comprehension, Communication: Speaker, Communication: Listener, Appraisal, Application/function
Specific context: General
Validation sample population age: Older Adults: 65+ years, Adults: 18 to 64 years
Modes of administration in validation study: Paper and pencil, Face-to-face

Psychometrics

Number of items: 5
Sample size in validation study: 633
Language of validated version: Spanish

Main article reference

Pleasant A., Maish, C., O'Leary, C., & Carmona, R.H. (2018) A theory-based self-report measure of health literacy: The Calgary Charter on Health Literacy scale. Methodological Innovations 11(3).
Article first published online: December 25, 2018; Issue published: September 1, 2018
https://doi.org/10.1177/2059799118814394

Link to article

Corresponding author

user
Andrew Pleasant
map-pin
United States of America
Contact the corresponding author for this tool

Description

We set out to test a theory-based measure of health literacy. To do so, we included the newly developed Calgary Charter on Health Literacy scale in Pre- and Post-evaluation of the Life Enhancement Program at multiple sites. The program focusing on health literacy and the prevention of chronic disease is conducted with health-care provider organization partners across the United States. In testing the reliability and validity of the new measure of health literacy, Cronbach’s alpha is very acceptable level at 0.80. There are numerous statistically significant correlations between the change in health literacy and participants’ changes in knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, behaviors, and health status. Data and analysis indicate that the Calgary Charter on Health Literacy Scale is a valid and reliable measurement tool in the contexts and with the populations they were tested within. More testing is necessary and warranted in a wider variety of contexts and populations—ideally to include large representative random samples and comparison groups. We recommend that policymakers increase focus on advancing health literacy as an evidence-based approach to reach the goals of improved individual and public health at a lower cost.

Year Measure first Published: 2018

About This Measure

Categorical scoring: No

About the Validation of this Measure

Country where validated: United States of America
Content validity: See article - open access
Reliability notes: See article - open access
lightbulb

We would love your feedback on this measure. Please send your comments or questions to the Tool Shed.

Send Feedback
Jump back to top